Legal Opinion

John Doe v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2016No. 43165PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. Nature of the Case

This case arises out of Appellant’s, the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes (Tribes), intervention in the adoption proceedings of a minor child (Child). While the adoption itself is not at issue on appeal, disputes that arose during the adoption proceedings are. Respondents, Jane and John Doe (Does), initiated adoption proceedings for Child after the rights of Child’s parents were terminated. Because Child may qualify for protection under the laws protecting an Indian child’s welfare, the Tribes were given notice and intervened in the adoption proceeding. The trial…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellyIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Genho v. Riverdale Hot Springs, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Jaymie Quigley v. Travis KempIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Genho v. Riverdale Hot Springs, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Watkins v. WatkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API