Legal Opinion

Hanna v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 1999No. 45A05-9811-CR-567PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTINGLY, Judge

Thomas Hanna and five co-defendants (collectively, the defendants) appeal a trial court order granting the State’s motion to disqualify the counsel jointly retained by the defendants and directing each defendant to secure individual representation. The defendants raise a single issue, 1 which we restate as whether the trial court properly disqualified defense counsel on the ground that the joint representation was inherently in conflict with the oath of counsel, even though each defendant waived, after a hearing before a magistrate and a meeting with an independent…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. Richard A. Diozzi, United States of America v. Diane M. DiozziCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  5. Alcocer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Blake v. HatcherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. EhlersNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State Ex Rel. Michael A.P. v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Latta v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Robertson v. WittenmyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API