United States v. Richard A. Diozzi, United States of America v. Diane M. Diozzi
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Circuit Judge.
Diane and Richard Diozzi were convicted of multiple counts of income tax evasion. They argue on appeal that the pretrial disqualification of their defense attorneys violated their sixth amendment right to counsel of choice. The Diozzis originally brought this argument to our attention in their pretrial petition for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to revoke its disqualification order. Though we found that interlocutory intervention through the extraordinary remedy of mandamus was inappropriate, we suggested that district court judges should exercise…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Bernard McKeonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Roy Wilson v. Barry MintzesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- United States v. Frank Locascio, and John GottiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- United States v. Francis Ditommaso A/K/A "Checco", Rudolfo Risatti, A/K/A "Rudy", Sheila Silvetti, Victoriano Molina-ChaconCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Jose E. Panzardi-Alvarez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Ullmann v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.