Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Scott

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 7, 2002No. SC96087, SC97020PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

810 So.2d 893 (2002)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, Cross-Respondent,

v.

John L. SCOTT, Respondent, Cross-Complainant.

Nos. SC96087, SC97020.

Supreme Court of Florida.

February 7, 2002.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, John Anthony Boggs, Staff Counsel, and Edward Iturralde, Bar Counsel, Tallahassee, FL, for Complainant, Cross-Respondent.

John L. Scott, pro se, Branford, FL, for Respondent, Cross-Complainant.

2Per curiam

We have for review a referee's report regarding alleged ethical breaches by attorney John L. Scott. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

FACTS

The Bar filed two complaints…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. The Florida Bar v. JordanSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  4. State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. DentonNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. The Florida Bar v. NowackiSupreme Court of Florida · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. BryantSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. The Florida Bar v. TiplerSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  3. Florida Bar v. SentonSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  4. The Florida Bar v. SentonSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  5. Florida Board of Bar ExaminersSupreme Court of Florida · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API