Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Bryant

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 21, 2002No. SC94965, SC00-801PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

813 So.2d 38 (2002)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

John Newman BRYANT, Respondent.

Nos. SC94965, SC00-801.

Supreme Court of Florida.

February 21, 2002.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, John Anthony Boggs, Staff Counsel, and James N. Watson, Jr., Bar Counsel, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, FL, for Complainant.

John Newman Bryant, pro se, Jacksonville, FL, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

We have for review a referee's report regarding alleged ethical breaches by John Newman Bryant in two separate matters, which were consolidated by the referee. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. The Bar…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re ReddSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  2. The Florida Bar v. ViningSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. People v. CrossmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. The Florida Bar v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 2002

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. CulverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. In re Robert Lee Vogel, BPR 023374Tennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Florida Bar v. RobertoSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  4. Florida Bar v. SentonSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  5. The Florida Bar v. SentonSupreme Court of Florida · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API