Legal Opinion

Independent Brewing Co. v. McCrimmon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1915No. 12438PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered July 29, 1914, granting a new trial, after the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

On November 28, 1911, the respondent, Independent Brewing Company, and the appellant McCrimmon entered into a written agreement, by the terms of which McCrimmon was given the exclusive agency to sell, for a stated period, the respondent’s product in the city of Tacoma and the surrounding territory. The appellants Bell, *611Alfred and Pickford, by writing, guaranteed the faithful performance of the contract on the part of McCrimmon. Subsequently the relations of the parties were discontinued, and the respondent, claiming a balance due upon the contract, brought this action against McCrimmon and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Dexter Horton & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Best v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Holloway v. SavageWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Bender v. RinkerWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Bank of Commerce v. NewberryWashington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sturtevant Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Coppo v. Van WieringenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Armstrong v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Getty v. HuttonWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Schwartz v. RandolphCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API