Bank of Commerce v. Newberry
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the superior court for Yakima county, Preble, J., entered January 22, 1912, granting a new trial, after findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
After a trial upon the merits, the court announced that he would make findings and conclusions in favor of the plaintiff. Thereafter a motion for a new trial was entertained. The motion was based upon several statutory grounds, including the following: That there was an error in the assessment of the amount of recovery allowed *423plaintiff, in that it was greater than any sum proven upon the trial; that the evidence adduced at the trial was not sufficient to justify the decision; and that the decision is contrary to law. Other grounds were urged in the motion, but we will not consider them. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Snider v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. HurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Sylvester v. OlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- Holloway v. SavageWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Taylor v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Equitable Life Assurance Society v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Independent Brewing Co. v. McCrimmonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Carter Oil Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935