Legal Opinion

Carso v. Norwich Union Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 31, 1927No. 8980PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLane, J.

One Sam Schwartz was, on the 24th day of August, 1925, engaged in the manufacture of soda water, under the name of “Texberry Bottling Works,” in the city of Houston. Schwartz, under such name, was a subscriber under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of the state of Texas (Rev. St. 1925, arts. 8306-8309), and at the time of the employment, injury, and death of one Frank Carso, a boy of 14 years of age, held a policy issued by the Norwich Union Indemnity Company, hereinafter referred to as the Indemnity Company, covering the employees engaged in said manufacturing business of Schwartz.

On or about…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Waterman Lumber Co. v. BeattyTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Iron & Wire Co. v. GreenTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Waterman Lumber Co. v. BeattyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Galloway v. Lumbermen's Indemnity ExchangeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  5. Franklin Fire Insurance v. BrockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. GilleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API