Legal Opinion

Iron & Wire Co. v. Green

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1901PublishedCited by 35 opinions

EEOM HAMILTON. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court , of Hamilton County. Eloyd Estill, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

The defendant in error is a minor who, while in the service of the plaintiff in error, a manufacturing corporation in Chattanooga, received an injury which necessitated the amputation of a leg. At that time he was under twelve years of age. This suit was brought to recover damages for this injury, and it resulted in a verdict and judgment in his favor of $3,000.

The record discloses that the boy had been at work for the plaintiff in error inside its factory, and that, going outside to a yard of the company, attached to the factory building, he was *163seriously injured by some panels of iron fence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Queen v. Dayton Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Berdos v. Tremont & Suffolk MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Purtell v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Inland Steel Co. v. YedinakIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Starnes Ex Rel. Starnes v. Albion Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Chattanooga Ry. & Light Co. v. BettisTennessee Supreme Court · 1917

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API