Legal Opinion

Waterman Lumber Co. v. Beatty

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1920No. 3254PublishedCited by 65 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Sixth District in an appeal from Harrison County. Beatty sued the Lumber Company and recovered judgment which was affirmed (204 S. W., 448) on appeal by defendant, who thereupon obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenwood

The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed a judgment in favor of defendant in error against plaintiff in error, for damages for personal injuries.

Plaintiff in error attacks the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals, to the effect that there was no error in that portion of the trial court’s charge, wherein the jury were authorized to return a verdict for defendant in error if they believed that at the time of his injury, on or about the 9th day of May, 1917, defendant in error was a minor under the age of 15 years, and if they further believed that his injuries were received on account of being…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BighamTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Elk Cotton Mills v. GrantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railroad v. American StatesmanTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Texas v. HarringtonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. Mundy v. Pirie-Slaughter Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  4. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. BehneTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  5. East Texas Motor Freight Lines v. LoftisTexas Supreme Court · 1949

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API