Legal Opinion
Yates v. HAGERSTOWN LODGE NO. 212 ORDER OF MOOSE
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 9, 1995No. Civ. N-94-2308PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NORTHROP, Senior District Judge.
Pending before this Court for resolution are motions by Defendants Mr. David Jenkins, Hagerstown Lodge No. 212 (“the Lodge”), and Moose International, Inc. (“Moose International”), to dismiss Plaintiff Mr. James Yates’ six-count Complaint. The Complaint alleges violations of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1982, and 1985(3), and seeks compensatory and injunctive relief. Yates has opposed Defendants’ motions and Defendants have submitted replies thereto. Upon consideration of the pleadings and papers, this Court finds no hearing…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Darden v. Daimlerchrysler North America Holding Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- National City Bank v. Lapides (In Re Transcolor Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- Antonio v. SECURITY SERVICES OF AMERICA, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
- Williams v. Cloverleaf Farms Dairy, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- Moxley v. Town of WalkersvilleDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.