Legal Opinion

Carter v. Miller

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1935No. 29168PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This was an action by Carter and Noyes, copartners, against Rome Miller, to recover damages for failure to perform the covenants and agreements of a lease alleged to have been made by him and covering a certain lot in Omaha, Nebraska. By proper pleading the substantial allegations of plaintiffs’ petition were traversed, and the making of the engagements therein alleged were denied. A trial resulted in verdict and judgment for plaintiffs. From the order overruling his motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.

It seems conceded by the parties that no formal written lease was ever delivered by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Krum v. ChamberlainNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Holmes v. BlochSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. New v. Germania Fire InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Nolin Milling Co. v. White Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Burke v. FryeNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hayne v. CookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Cheeper's Rent-A-Car, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API