Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Southern Grocery Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 27, 1939No. 14990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

This is an action for slander. The plaintiff is a minor of the age of nineteen years and appears by his guardian ad litem. The defendant is a corporation.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff was employed as a clerk in defendant’s store situate at 1093 King Street, in the City of Charleston, South Carolina. That at the times mentioned in the complaint, one B. F. Henderson was employed as superintendent of defendant’s stores in the district which included the store above named in the City of Charleston. That Henderson came to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Turner v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  2. Fitchette v. Sumter Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  3. Lily v. Belk's Department StoreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  4. Black v. State Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  5. Merritt v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sandifer v. Electrolux Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  2. Nettles v. MacMillan Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API