Legal Opinion

Nettles v. MacMillan Petroleum Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 28, 1947No. 15929PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FishburnE, AJ.:

The action is for slander. Upon trial, at the close of the testimony offered by the plaintiff, the defendant moved for judgment of nonsuit on the ground that the words proved to have been spoken were not actionable per se, and that inasmuch as the plaintiff offered no evidence to show the meaning of such words as interpreted by any person present who may have heard them, there was not sufficient evidence to go to the jury on the question of slander. This motion was granted, and from this ruling the plaintiff appeals.

The substance of the allegations of the complaint and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sheftall v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Turner v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  3. Gill v. RugglesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
  4. Campbell v. Life Casualty Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  5. Reynolds v. Southern Grocery Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Holtzscheiter v. Thomson Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Jones v. GarnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968
  3. Holtzscheiter v. Thomson Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Sandifer v. Electrolux Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  5. Davis v. NiederhofSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API