Legal Opinion

Merritt v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 4, 1936No. 14246PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

This is an action for damages for slander. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff bought a sack of flour at one of the defendant’s stores, and when he left with the flour a clerk of the defendant followed him to another store and there accused him of stealing the flour by publicly uttering the words “you got to come and show the clerk you bought the sack of flour from,” meaning thereby that he had stolen the flour, which caused him much embarrassment, humiliation, worry, and injury, to his damage in the sum of $3,000.00. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Turner v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  2. Fitchette v. Sumter Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  3. White v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  4. Lily v. Belk's Department StoreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  5. Williamson v. Askin & Marine Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Holtzscheiter v. Thomson Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Hoeffner Ex Rel. Estate of Hoeffner v. CitadelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Johnson v. LIFE INS. CO. OF GEORGIASupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. Sandifer v. Electrolux Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
  5. Drakeford v. Dixie Home StoresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API