Elwood v. McDill
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Mills District Court. — Hon. A. B. Thor-nell, Judge. Action at law to recover amounts alleged to be due on two promissory notes. There was a trial by jury, ,and verdict and judgment for the defendant.' The plaintiff appeals, —
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
— Each of the notes in suit was given by the defendant to the plaintiff on the ninth day of November, 1887, for the sum of one thousand and fifty dollars, with interest thereon at the rate of seven per cent, per annum. One was due July 1, 1889; and the other one year later. The notes and a stallion owned by the defendant, valued at four hundred dollars-, were given to the plaintiff for a French stallion, known as “Fr-eycinet,” valued at two thousand five hundred dollars. As a part of the transaction, the plaintiff gave to the defendant a written warranty that Fr-eycinet was sound, and a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- James H. Love & Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Hefner v. HaynesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
3Cited by11 opinions
- Nave v. PowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Denver Horse Importing Co. v. SchaferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
- Hauss v. SurranCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Glover Machine Works v. Cooke-Jellico Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Timken Carriage Co. v. C. S. Smith & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.