Legal Opinion

State v. Isenhour

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 2008No. COA08-478PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. Subsequent to the trial court’s denial, defendant pled guilty to one count of possession of methadone, preserving his right to appeal under North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 27 L. Ed. 2d 162 (1970). After careful review, we affirm the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress and therefore the judgment.

On 5 May 2006, Lynn Edward Isenhour (“defendant”) was arrested after a search of his car revealed methadone pills that were not prescribed to him. Prior to the arrest, defendant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. LupekCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. MangumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. State v. MarreroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. State v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. State v. VeálCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API