Legal Opinion

State v. Veál

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 1, 2014No. COA13-1407PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCullough, judge.

Douglas Eugene Veal (“defendant”) appeals the order of the trial court, denying his motion to suppress evidence. For the following reasons, we affirm the order of the trial court.

I. Background

On 4 July 2011, Officer Rodney Cloer of the Asheville Police Department (“Officer Cloer”) was dispatched to a report of an intoxicated driver in a green Chevy truck at the Citistop gas station located at 760 Haywood Road. The report of an intoxicated person came through dispatch from an employee at the Citistop gas station. Dispatch reported that there was a very intoxicated male…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. State v. Myers-McNeilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  3. State v. CarverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  4. State v. CarverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  5. State v. Myers-McNeilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API