Legal Opinion

Williams v. Commonwealth ex rel. Smith

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 12, 1914PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Alexandria in a proceeding by quo warranto. Judgment for the petitioners. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

The only question involved in this case, which is a proceeding of quo warranto, is whether or not the plaintiff in error was a resident of the city of Alexandria. It is averred in the petition for the writ, which was filed on the 25th of January, 1913, that the plaintiff in error was, at the regular election in June, 1910, elected a member of the common council of that city, from the second ward, for a term of four years, commencing on September 1 following, and that he qualified as such member of the council by taking the oath, and entered upon the discharge of his duties at the commencement…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. HapgoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  2. State ex rel. Spence v. Judge of the Ninth Judicial CircuitSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
  3. Pendleton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  4. Lindsay v. MurphySupreme Court of Virginia · 1882
  5. Griffin v. WoolfordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. White v. ManchinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Dorf v. SkolnikCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Towson v. TowsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  4. Hiles v. HilesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  5. Dotson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API