Griffin v. Woolford
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Roanoke city, rendered January 30, 1902, in an action of debt, wherein the plaintiff in error was the plaintiff, and the defendant in error was the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.
The controversy in this case arises out of the following facts: On January 22, 1892, O. A. Woolford and the defendant in *474error, O. W. Woolford, made two notes to the Hew Lansdowne Land Company, which were dated and made payable at Roanoke, Va., one and two years after date, respectively. These notes were endorsed and delivered by the payee to the Lansdowne Improvement Company. Subsequently, plaintiff in error, having been appointed receiver of the latter company, recovered judgment upon the notes against C. A. Woolford and the endorser, the Hew Lansdowne Land Company. C. W. Woolford was made…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Peck v. JennessSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Ex Parte City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Coler v. CleburneSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Brown v. ButlerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1891
- Markle's adm'r v. Burch's adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chandler v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac Railroad v. Martin's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
- Continental Casualty Co. v. The Benny SkouCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
- Kesterson's Administrator v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1903
- Harmon v. PeerySupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.