Legal Opinion
Bolden v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 4, 2003No. 02 Civ. 1606(RMB)Published
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
BERMAN, District Judge.
I. Background
On or about March 1, 2002, Gary Bolden and Ronnie Fordham (“Plaintiffs”) brought this action to challenge their automatic terminations from employment by the City of New York following their 1999 convictions on federal charges of filing fraudulent tax returns in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 287, 3551. Complaint dated March 1, 2002 (“Complaint”) ¶¶ 10-23. Plaintiffs had been employed by the New York City Department of Corrections as “permanent competitive class” civil servants and were summarily terminated pursuant to New York Public Officer’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.