Legal Opinion

Charles Edward Jackson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 1, 1964No. 21393_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In connection with a sale of approximately 66.3 milligrams of heroin hydrochloride, Jackson was tried and convicted of violating section 174 of Title 21, United States Code. The judgment of conviction was affirmed by this Court in an opinion which stated that “A careful reading of the record of the trial indicates to us that the defendant was given a fair trial and his rights were scrupulously guarded.” Jackson v. United States, 1963, 311 F.2d 686. The Supreme Court denied certiorari, 374 U.S. 850, 83 S.Ct. 1913, 10 L.Ed.2d 1070. On Jackson’s motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C.A. §…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arnold George Lauer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  2. Ricardo Borroto v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  3. Charles Edward Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Hallman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  5. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Charles Edward Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Benito Saenz Firo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  3. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1966
  4. Jose Martinez Mendoza v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  5. Eugene Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API