Ricardo Borroto v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
The appellant was convicted on six counts of an indictment charging narcotics offenses. Two counts of the indictment, charging sales of narcotics, were attacked on the ground that the identity of the purchaser was not shown. The district court rejected this contention and we are in agreement with its view. While it has been held that an indictment so drawn is defective 1 the majority and, we think, the better rule 2 is otherwise.
None of the other specifications of error were preserved for review on appeal although the appellant was represented at the trial by counsel of his own selection.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arnold George Lauer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
- Clone S. Clay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Ernest Eugene Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- David Jackson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Llamas v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1963
3Cited by17 opinions
- Howard Wallace Barbee and Bobby Joe Manziel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Offerdahl v. District Court of the Eighth Judicial District Ex Rel. County of CascadeMontana Supreme Court · 1971
- Benito Saenz Firo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Jose Martinez Mendoza v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Melvin Eugene MeadowsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.