Legal Opinion
Jackson v. United States
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided August 17, 1966No. Civ. A. 4-385PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BREWSTER, District Judge.
The petitioner’s motion under 28 U.S. C.A. § 2255, seeking to vacate his conviction and sentence in this Court for sale of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 174, alleges two grounds: (1) The government knowingly used perjured testimony. (2) The petitioner’s co-defendant, Hathman White, was permitted to plead guilty in the presence of the jury that tried petitioner.
The conviction was affirmed in Jackson v. United States, 5 Cir., 311 F.2d 686 (1963). Aj udgment denying petitioner’s first Section 2255 motion to vacate, Jackson v. United States, D.C.Tex., 225 F.…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Perry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Danny Kates v. Louis Nelson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- State v. FosnightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.