Legal Opinion

People v. Daggett

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1990No. B044208PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, J.

Rickie Lynn Daggett was charged with 8 counts of sexual offenses against Daryl H., a child under age 14 and more than 10 years younger than Daggett. A jury found him guilty of four of those counts.

Daggett contends, among other matters, that the trial court abused its discretion when it refused to hold a hearing pursuant to Evidence Code section 782 on the admissibility of evidence that Daryl had been previously molested by other children. He also asserts prosecutorial misconduct. We agree and reverse.

Facts

After Daryl had been charged in juvenile court with molesting two…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. TalleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. People v. AndrewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. LawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  4. People v. Arredondo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. State of Arizona v. James Clayton JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 2019

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API