Legal Opinion
People v. Arredondo
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided March 19, 2018No. D072632PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBenke, Acting P. J.
*383*495The jury convicted both defendants in this case of first degree murder and found the special circumstances that the murder was committed during the course of a robbery and during the course of a kidnapping. The jury found that one of the defendants, Angelo Andrew Arredondo, had used a firearm in committing the murder. The jury found both defendants committed the murder for the benefit of a criminal street gang.
As we explain more fully below, on this direct appeal we are not in a position to find that Arredondo's counsel was ineffective in conceding that his *496client was guilty of felony…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- People v. Garcia, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Anthony, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Hurlic, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Johnson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Zamora, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.