Legal Opinion

People v. Armstrong

California Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 2019No. S126560PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

*744 After a jury convicted defendant Jamelle Edward Armstrong of kidnapping, robbing, raping, torturing, and murdering Penny Sigler, it returned a death verdict.

*120 On automatic appeal, we affirm Armstrong's convictions but reverse his death sentence because, under the standards of Witherspoon v. Illinois (1968) 391 U.S. 510 , 88 S.Ct. 1770 , 20 L.Ed.2d 776 and Wainwright v. Witt (1985) 469 U.S. 412 , 105 S.Ct. 844 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 , multiple prospective jurors were improperly excused for cause.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Guilt Phase Trial

On the night of December 29, 1998, Penny Sigler,…

2Cases cited110 opinions

  1. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. People v. PottsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. People v. RhoadesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  3. People v. Silveria and TravisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  4. People v. MilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  5. People v. NievesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API