People v. Armstrong
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
*744 After a jury convicted defendant Jamelle Edward Armstrong of kidnapping, robbing, raping, torturing, and murdering Penny Sigler, it returned a death verdict.
*120 On automatic appeal, we affirm Armstrong's convictions but reverse his death sentence because, under the standards of Witherspoon v. Illinois (1968) 391 U.S. 510 , 88 S.Ct. 1770 , 20 L.Ed.2d 776 and Wainwright v. Witt (1985) 469 U.S. 412 , 105 S.Ct. 844 , 83 L.Ed.2d 841 , multiple prospective jurors were improperly excused for cause.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Guilt Phase Trial
On the night of December 29, 1998, Penny Sigler,…
2Cases cited110 opinions
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- People v. PottsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. RhoadesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. Silveria and TravisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- People v. MilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- People v. NievesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.