Legal Opinion

Lundquist v. Leonard

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 17, 2002No. C9-02-1351PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION. PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Russ Lundquist filed a petition under Minn.Stat. § 204B.44 (2000) alleging a wrongful act or omission by the respondent county auditor in her placement of candidate Margaret Tilley’s name on the ballot for the 2002 election. The petition was referred to a referee to take and receive evidence and make findings of fact relative to petitioner’s claim that the candidate will not have resided in Legislative District 38A for six months immediately preceding the general election as required by Minn. Const, art. IV, § 6. The referee found that Tilley established…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fetsch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Moe v. AlsopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Piepho v. BrunsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  4. Nelson v. O'Neil AmusementsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. Parsons v. HickeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Weiler v. RitchieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar IrbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Studer v. KiffmeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Monaghen v. SimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  5. Begin v. RitchieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API