Legal Opinion

Parsons v. Hickey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 6, 1972No. 43950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an original proceeding brought under Minn. St. 203.38, subd. 1, to challenge the right of respondent John Wingard to have his name appear on the ballot as a candidate for the House of Representatives from Legislative District 42A in the November 1972 general election, on the grounds that he does not reside in the district in which he seeks to be elected.

In a similar proceeding under § 203.38, subd. 1, prior to the primary election, we issued our order to show cause why the name of respondent should not be omitted from the ballot at the primary election. The case reached us so late…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sixty-Seventh Minnesota State Senate v. BeensSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. In Re Candidacy of DalySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Moe v. AlsopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Beens v. ErdahlDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1972
  5. State Ex Rel. McGrath v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Piepho v. BrunsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Lundquist v. LeonardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Olson v. ZEUHLKESupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API