Legal Opinion

Claraty v. Hall-Mills

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 2, 2020No. 3:18-cv-06861Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 NOE-MARIE FILICE CLARATY, Case No. 18-cv-06861-JCS 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 10 LINDA HALL-MILLS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 31 Defendants. 11 12 I. INTRODUCTION 13 Plaintiff Noe-Marie Claraty, pro se, brings this action under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

and the 14 Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) based on her temporary loss of custody of two minor children. 15 Claraty names as Defendants Contra Costa County (the “County”) and Linda Hall-Mills, a social 16 worker employed by the County.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API