Legal Opinion

People v. Rhoden

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 23, 1999No. D031235PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McDONALD, J.

Mary K. Rhoden appeals a judgment following her jury conviction of transportation of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379, subd. (a)), possession for sale of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378), burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), 1 and receiving stolen property (§ 496, subd. (a)). Rhoden contends the trial court erred by not enforcing a plea bargain from which the prosecutor withdrew before the bargain was submitted for court approval. We affirm the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

In August 1997 pawnshop employee AnnaMarie Nachazel…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
  2. Michael Wayne Riggs v. J.W. Fairman, Jr., WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Michael Cuero v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Riggs v. FairmanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2001
  5. Michael Cuero v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API