Legal Opinion
Lutterloh v. McIlhenny Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Decided May 21, 1889No. 6252PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from Coryell. Tried below before Hon. T. L. Nugent. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Acker, Presiding Judge.
The McIlhenny Company brought this suit against plaintiff in error and others on a note for $2566.66, dated *74July 15, 1884, due at ninety days with interest from date at ten per cent per annum. The note was joint and several, and was signed H. L. Watkins & Co., Pidcock & Co., and A. J. Holmes.
An attachment was sued out at .the time of filing the suit, which was levied on land belonging to plaintiff in error, who, it was alleged in the petition, was a member of the firm of H. L. Watkins & Co.
Lutterloh answered under-oath that he was not a member of the firm of Watkins &…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tarkinton v. C. E. Broussard & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1879
- Clair v. McGeheeTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Marx & Kempner v. AbramsonTexas Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boyd v. BevilleTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Walden v. LockeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Beville v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
- Taylor v. A. ReadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908