Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Beville

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1898No. 614PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District, in an appeal from Wise County.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

The defendant in error, R. M. Seville, instituted this suit in the District Court of Wise County against O. E. Boyd, by original petition filed February 12, 1895, which, after the formal statement of names and residences of the parties, contained the following allegations: “That heretofore, to-wit, on the 3rd day of October, 1894, the said defendant O. E. Boyd made, executed, and for a valuable consideration delivered to the Wise County National Bank Ms certain promissory note in writing, whereby he promised to pay, on the 27th of January, thereafter, the sum of one…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stewart v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Bigham v. Talbot & CropperTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Tarkinton v. C. E. Broussard & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Barry v. Screwmen's Benevolent Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Sweetzer, Pembroke & Co. v. H. B. Claflin & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Phoenix Lumber Co. v. Houston Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Pope v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Fuller v. El Paso Times Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. American Exchange Nat. Bank of Dallas v. KeeleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Richardson v. McCloskeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API