In re Condict
District Court, D. New Jersey
On specifications against discharge.
1Opinion of the Court
NIXON, District Judge.
Nine specifications are filed against the bankrupt’s discharge. The counsel for the bankrupt in the argument moved to strike out six, to wit: the second, fourth, sixth, seventh, eighth, and ninth, as being vague and insufficient The second is in these words: “Because the said Frederick K. Condict, with the said other bankrupts, contrary to the provisions of the said bankrupt act [of 1867 (14 Stat 517)], and its several supplements, did conceal his and their estate and effects and did conceal, remove, alter and destroy the books and writings relating thereto.” The defects…
2Cited by2 opinions
- In re HixonDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1899
- In re GravesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1885