Legal Opinion
Pususta v. State Farm Insurance Companies
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 19, 2001No. C8-99-1068Published
1Opinion of the Court
632 N.W.2d 549 (2001)
Mariah PUSUSTA, Respondent,
v.
STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES, Petitioner, Appellant.
No. C8-99-1068.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
July 19, 2001.
Robert W. Roe, Thomas J. Lyons & Associates, P.A., St. Paul, for respondent.
William M. Hart, Katherine A. McBride, Jenneane L. Jansen, Meagher & Geer, P.L.L.P., Minneapolis, for appellant.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Justice.
In mandatory arbitration, respondent Mariah Pususta sought no-fault medical expense benefits from her insurance carrier, appellant State Farm Insurance Companies…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Tlougan v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Phelps v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Nathe Bros., Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.