Legal Opinion

Fults v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 1989No. 55300PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Movant appeals from the order of the trial court denying him relief pursuant to Rule 27.26 (now repealed).

Movant was convicted on April 24, 1985, of one count of rape, two counts of sodomy, and one count of incest. The victim in each case was his daughter, fifteen years old at the time of the offenses. We affirmed the convictions in State v. Fults, 719 S.W.2d 46 (Mo.App.1986).

The information in Count I alleged that the defendant had sexual intercourse with the victim “to whom defendant was not married” without the consent of the victim by the use of forcible compulsion.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. State v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  4. State v. HaslerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. State v. BolenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BeauregardTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Bass v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. HodgesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State v. PerkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State v. GordonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API