Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Weinberg

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 13, 1995No. 24198PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney grievance proceeding, respondent admits that he has committed ethical violations and consents to an eighteen (18) month suspension from the practice of law in this State. We accept respondent’s admission and suspend him for eighteen (18) months, retroactive to September 22, 1994, the date this Court temporarily suspended him from the practice of law.

The ethical violations committed by respondent arise from a number of matters in which he failed to bring a lawsuit, failed to file a workers’ compensation claim, or failed to serve a requested notice of appeal on behalf of his…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re GloverSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. In re TrexlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Matter of FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API