Legal Opinion

Pike v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1994No. 1915 C.D. 1993PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIG, President Judge.

The claimant, Steven Pike, appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed a referee’s decision determining that the employer, Bob Hart Contractors, properly computed the claimant’s average weekly wage pursuant to § 309(d) of the Worker’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 582(d). We vacate and remand.

According to the record, the facts in this case are as follows. The claimant started working for the employer in September, 1990. The claimant suffered a work-related injury on January 30,1991. Thereafter,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Follett v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Bethlehem Mines Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Port Authority v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Fantastic Sam's v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Straight Line Express v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Cassell Paving, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. County of Delaware v. WCAB (Worrell)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API