Legal Opinion

Maxcy v. City of Washburn

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed April 3, 1928:

Stevens, J.(1) The case presents the question of the right of the city to offset a claim against the water company which accrued prior to the appointment of a receiver, against a claim due the receiver which matured after his appointment. The receiver’s claim includes hydrant rentals for the period of six months, part of which had elapsed be*568fore the receiver was appointed, but these rentals did not become due and payable until after the appointment of the receiver.

“The general rule undoubtedly is that a receiver takes subject to setoffs which the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Colton v. Drovers' Perpetual Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  3. State v. BrobstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  4. Jones v. PieningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  5. McLaughlin v. WinnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  2. Banking Commission v. BitkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Nick v. HoltzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  4. H. G.L. Coleman, Inc. v. Winters Bk. Tr. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API