Maxcy v. City of Washburn
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed April 3, 1928:
Stevens, J.(1) The case presents the question of the right of the city to offset a claim against the water company which accrued prior to the appointment of a receiver, against a claim due the receiver which matured after his appointment. The receiver’s claim includes hydrant rentals for the period of six months, part of which had elapsed be*568fore the receiver was appointed, but these rentals did not become due and payable until after the appointment of the receiver.
“The general rule undoubtedly is that a receiver takes subject to setoffs which the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Colton v. Drovers' Perpetual Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- State v. BrobstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Jones v. PieningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- McLaughlin v. WinnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Banking Commission v. BitkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Nick v. HoltzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- H. G.L. Coleman, Inc. v. Winters Bk. Tr. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934