Legal Opinion

Nick v. Holtz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Appellant, acting under the authority of his chattel mortgage of August 22, 1938, recorded March 21, 1939, took possession of the airplanes March 21, 1939. Respondent receiver was appointed and qualified March 6, 1939. It is understood to be a fact, as the circuit court found, that the mortgage of appellant is a valid claim giving the appellant a lien upon this particular property.

The question presented upon this appeal is one of practice rather than of substantive law. As stated by the respondent in his motion made in the replevin action after the validity of the mortgage had been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jersey City Welding & MacHine Works, Inc. v. Hudson County White Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  2. Maxcy v. City of WashburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Paradise v. RidenourWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Candee v. EganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Conrad v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Department of Revenue v. Milwaukee MacK Sales, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API