Legal Opinion

Louis G. Boli and Mary K. Boli v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided October 15, 1987No. 87-1257PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Circuit Judge.

Section 86 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, 26 U.S.C. § 86 (1982 & Supp. II 1984), provides that for a taxpayer whose “modified adjusted gross income” exceeds a certain amount, part of his Social Security benefits must be included in gross income. The question in this tax refund case, here on appeal from the United States Claims Court, is whether the inclusion of tax-exempt municipal bond interest in a taxpayer’s “modified adjusted gross income,” as section 86 requires, results in an impermissible tax on the interest. The Claims Court answered that question…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  3. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. United States v. Atlas Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Shapiro v. BakerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glaxo, Inc. And Glaxo Group Limited v. Torpharm, Inc., Apotex Usa, Inc. And Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. In Re ComiskeyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  3. Levine v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API