Legal Opinion

Levine v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided August 18, 1992No. Docket No. 26688-90Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

BEN AND HELEN E. LEVINE, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Levine v. Commissioner

Docket No. 26688-90

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1992-469; 1992 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 484; 64 T.C.M. (CCH) 531;

August 18, 1992, Filed

Decision will be entered for respondent in the corrected amounts.

For Ben Levine and Helen E. Levine: pro se.

For Respondent: John Altman.

BUCKLEY

BUCKLEY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BUCKLEY, Special Trial Judge: This case was assigned pursuant to the provisions of section 7443A(b)(3) 1 and Rules 180, 181, and 182. Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners' 1988…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Neely v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  3. Bixby v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  4. Enoch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  5. William R. And Lorna E. Hall v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API