United States v. Smart
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
■ In Error to and Appeal from the District Court of the United States for tire District of Colorado ; Robert E. Lewis, Judge. Criminal prosecution by the United States against Thomas R. Smart and others. From an order vacating an order adjudging forfeiture of a recognizance, the United States brings error and appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The United States challenges by appeal and writ of error an order of the court below, made on September 6, 1915, vacating its order of November 19, 1914, which adjudged the forfeiture of the recognizance of the defendant Thomas R. Smart and his sureties, and directing that, out of the $1,500 which the sureties had caused to be paid to the clerk of the court in the case, $403.60, the cost of the apprehension and return of the defendant to the jurisdiction of the court, should be paid to the United States, that $18.20 should be paid to the clerk of the court on account of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. FeelyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1813
- United States v. TraynorDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1909
- United States v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
- United States v. SantosU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1862
- United States v. WinsteadDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Weber v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
- Skolnik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
- United States v. O'LearyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1921
- United States v. LibichianCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.