Legal Opinion

Gold Kist, Inc. v. Carr

Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)

Decided November 23, 1994No. 11-93-093-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McCLOUD, Chief Justice.

Edward C. Carr, Jr., entered into a written agreement with Gold Kist, Inc. to purchase trucks and peanut hauling equipment from Gold Kist. Carr later sued Gold Kist for damages alleging breach of contract, promissory estoppel, and fraud. The central issue in Carr’s suit was whether or not Carr had “exclusive hauling rights.” Trial was to the jury who found that:(1) Gold Kist agreed that Carr would have exclusive hauling of Gold Kist’ peanut commodities in the State of Texas during the term of the promissory note.(2) Carr was able to perform in accordance with…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Forbau Ex Rel. Miller v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. English v. FischerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. City of Pinehurst v. Spooner Addition Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re H.E. Butt Grocery Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  3. McClure v. Attebury, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
  4. Hurd v. Bac Home Loans Servicing, LPDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2012
  5. Taub v. Houston Pipeline Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API