Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance & Tremaine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and application granted. Memorandum: Respondent, a passenger in a motor vehicle owned by the State of New York (State), was involved in an accident on July 11, 1994. She served notice of an *963underinsurance claim on petitioner, her insurer, 2V2 years later, in December 1996. Respondent thereafter filed an uninsured claim under the State insurance policy and, after settling with the State for its policy limit, served a demand for arbitration of her underinsurance claim on petitioner. Supreme Court erred in denying the application to stay…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. MancusoNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. In re the Arbitration between Travelers Insurance & DeLoshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Unwin v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roofing Consultants, Inc. v. Scottsdale InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Arbitration between State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance & HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Potter v. North Country InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. In re the Arbitration between Hartford Casualty Insurance & BrodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API