Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Hartford Casualty Insurance & Brody
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 27, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking a permanent stay of arbitration on the ground that respondent failed to provide timely notice of a claim for supplemental uninsured motorist (SUM) benefits. Supreme Court erred in denying the petition without conducting a hearing. Respondent fractured her hand in a motor vehicle accident on January 6, 1998, and surgery was required to repair her hand. She did not file a claim for SUM benefits…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. MancusoNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- In re the Arbitration between Travelers Insurance & DeLoshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Arbitration between State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance & HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Arbitration between State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance & TremaineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re of the Arbitration between State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance and CybulskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Baust v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Arbitration between New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance & GuarinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001