Roofing Consultants, Inc. v. Scottsdale Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and judgment granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in declaring that Scottsdale Insurance Company (defendant) was obligated to pay half of the costs incurred in defending plaintiff Roofing Consultants, Inc. (Roofing Consultants) in the underlying action and to pay half of any award entered against Roofing Consultants in that action. In November 1995 an employee of Roofing Consultants was injured while working on a roofing project at a Mobil Oil Corporation (Mobil Oil) station. Roofing Consultants first…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Security Mutual Insurance v. Acker-Fitzsimons Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- White v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Medical Malpractice Insurance v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Heydt Contracting Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. CMA Enterprises., Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. Volmar Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- United States Underwriters Ins. v. Kum Gang Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Gregory Webster v. Mount Vernon Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- City of New York v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Webster ex rel. Webster v. Mount Vernon Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.