Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Vanouse v. Henry

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 17, 1967No. 40523PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

The state appeals from an order granting to defendants judgment notwithstanding a jury’s verdict and a conditional new trial, and from the judgment entered in favor of defendants.

The State Commission Against Discrimination after a hearing — and subsequently a jury after a trial de novo in the district court — found defendants “guilty” of an “unfair discriminatory practice” forbidden by Minn. St. 363.03, subd. 2(1) (a), of the State Act Against Discrimination.

Specifically, the jury by a five-sixths verdict found that defendants denied or withheld the rental of an apartment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. State v. JeffreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Godeen Ex Rel. Lindgren v. BennettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Department of Highways v. NormandinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Barnes v. Weis Management Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API