State Ex Rel. Vanouse v. Henry
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
The state appeals from an order granting to defendants judgment notwithstanding a jury’s verdict and a conditional new trial, and from the judgment entered in favor of defendants.
The State Commission Against Discrimination after a hearing — and subsequently a jury after a trial de novo in the district court — found defendants “guilty” of an “unfair discriminatory practice” forbidden by Minn. St. 363.03, subd. 2(1) (a), of the State Act Against Discrimination.
Specifically, the jury by a five-sixths verdict found that defendants denied or withheld the rental of an apartment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. JeffreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Godeen Ex Rel. Lindgren v. BennettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Department of Highways v. NormandinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Barnes v. Weis Management Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984