Legal Opinion
Vann Ex Rel. Vann v. Stewart
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided June 5, 2006No. 3:04-CV-493PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VARLAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Austin Vann alleges that his federal civil rights, along with Tennessee laws, were violated when defendants suspended him from school under Anderson County’s zero tolerance policy. Plaintiff was suspended for one calendar year after he was found with a small pocketknife on school grounds. Defendants generally deny plaintiffs allegations.
This civil action is now before the Court for consideration of defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 16], Defendants contend, inter alia, that plaintiff was given proper notice and an opportunity for a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- International Custom Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Doe v. University Of MississippiDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2019
- Barnett v. Tipton County Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2009
- A v. Park Hill School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2023
- D’ERICA and ROGER BLACKMON, as Guardians And Next Friends of E.B., a minor v. MCGEHEE SCHOOL DISTRICT, et alDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2026