Legal Opinion

Oatman v. Hampton

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1927Published

1Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

T. BAILEY LEE, J.

Respondents Schiffer, Geo. G. and

Lilly Thiessen, through their counsel, have filed a petition for rehearing accompanied by a garrulous and impertinent brief distinguished chiefly for its reckless innuendo. Ordinary regard for the amenities of the profession should inspire' upon the part of losing counsel, the assumption that errors of the court, if errors there be, are due solely to defective ratiocination and not to flagrant disregard of published statutes and decisions in order to attain the result desired. 'While in nowise minimizing this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ColtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Adams v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Bell v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Washington County Abstract Co. v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Murphy v. RedmondSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API